When people talk about river leadership they mean different things. Similarly when someone is described as a 'good' river leader, there are many ways in which their leadership may be worthy or praise. Perhaps they have good interpersonal skills, maybe they work in a very safe manner or they lead a group with great efficiency, allowing for speed of movement. Perhaps they just took you through that last grade 4 without you capsizing! Because river leading covers such a wide range of skills, I am going to look at it on 3 'levels':
At a basic level, two extremes of leadership styles may be identified: autocratic and consultative. The autocratic leader tells the group what to do whilst a consultative leader will simply allow the group to run itself and accept anarchy. Both styles have problems: a purely consultative leader might as well not be leading at all, whilst an autocrat will soon cause the group to degenerate and risks making poor decisions by not using the ideas of others. In practise, an effective leadership style will lie between these extremes, and will depend on two main factors:
Perhaps a good guide is to make decisions that are obvious or need making quickly for yourself and consult the group on matters where you feel their experience could be useful. On a river, there may be few situations where you need to consult the group. However, it is often useful to at least give the group a chance to contribute. This can be done by explaining your plan to the group before executing it and then inviting suggestions. This cuts out a lot of discussion, but allows any new ideas to be considered.
So, having considered how the leader carries out their task, you might be asking what a leader actually does. It is possible to identify 4 core activities:
In such a dynamic environment it is impossible to define a set of hard and fast rules. If you need to work beyond these principles, do so for as short a time as possible and be aware of the consequences.
When you start out,
When working out how to run a section
Some people like to remember all this with the pneumonic 'CLAP'.
So, how do you apply all this to a real situation? Most of the time on a river, the leader will control the group by one of three different leadership 'styles':
Which style to use depends on the group and the type of water being paddled. A good leader switches between styles as required. Briefing the group and having a good set of signals will help you to move fluidly from one style to another. Practise these techniques on easy rapids and drops with the group before you get to the hard section. You may find that eddy hopping on easier water gives you a good way to gauge the group's ability early in the trip, whilst familiarising them with this leadership style.
More competent groups will also work with similar river running 'styles'. The transitions will be very fluid and may not even need communicating. Formal signals etc. may only be required on large drops. Eddy hopping has the potential to acquire a range of variations: whoever is in front becomes the leader, and this may change regularly. The frequency of eddying out may vary considerably, depending on what the leader can see ahead.
That's the theory. How do we use this in practise? I've taken a few photos of rapids that I have run, constructed a diagram and suggested a way in which a leader might tackle problems. I've presented them in a 'problem, then solution' format, so that you can come up with your own ideas before I unveil mine. My answers aren't necessarily the right ones and your ideas might be better – it's more important that the process of coming to the answers is correct and robust. Current examples are from the Tryweryn, the Dart and the Ubaye.
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
The Tryweryn is well known to many British paddlers. Many know it's drops intimately. However, leading on some sections requires a little thought. The Ski Jump rapid is essentially a long ramp, with a small stopper half way down and a more meaty stopper at the bottom. There are eddies to either side of the main flow at the top. There is a large eddy on river right at the bottom, and a much smaller eddy on river left. The bottom stopper can be avoided by going river right, or, with some skill, by going hard river left. The picture above is taken from eddy D in the diagram, looking at a paddler playing in the large stopper. The top of the backwash of the smaller stopper can just be seen near the top of the ramp. Eddy C can be seen in the lower picture, which is a view looking along the large stopper from eddy D. High banks restrict visibility upstream, but paddlers in the bottom of eddy B can be seen. We will assume the group being led are on their first visit to the Tryweryn, but are competent grade 3 paddlers.
The ability of the paddlers and the combination of an off putting small stopper followed by a boat stopping stopper suggest it's probably best to bring the group down one at a time. The position of maximum usefulness is at the bottom of the drop, as this allows for rescues in the slacker water and from the larger stopper. You can't expect to help anyone higher up. You might consider putting someone with a throwline at the top of eddy C. So, leave the group at the top, run the drop, then bring them down using the appropriate hand signals. The problem here is mainly one of line of sight. The view from eddy C is very limited, and you can only see the bottom of eddy B from eddy D. So, you'll need to instruct the group to wait at the lower end of eddy B, and signal from eddy D. However, you don't want the entire group to join you in eddy D – there isn't space and you want them to go right to avoid a munching in the stopper. So, using hand signals, direct the group to make for eddy C, whilst you sit in eddy D.
![]() | ![]() |
The two pictures show views upstream and downstream of the Ubaye, taken from the bridge at la Fresquière. The section being paddled, down to le Martinet, is given grade 5 in the guidebook, due to the danger of pinning, however, the river feels more like a class 4+ paddle. The group are competent grade 4/4+ boaters. On a river such as this one each paddler must be able to look after themselves. So, how should the group negotiate this first section of the river?
The water should be within the capabilities of the group, particularly if they are planning to negotiate the harder rapids downstream. So, the options are to run the group down together or to use the eddy hopping techniques. There are just about enough rocks and eddies to make the latter viable, but do you need to bother, when the visibility downstream is so good? With a group that you know well, running down together will be the best option. However, if there is any doubt about the group, try eddy hopping. This will provide a good warm up, and let you see what break outs the group is capable of making. This will become critical later on, as a river of this grade may well have awkward 'must make' break outs above horizon lines. On a river of this level, you must be prepared to stop the group and ask some members to walk back up to the bridge if, after this first section, it is clear they are not up to the required standard.
![]() | ![]() |
The Upper Dart is one of the best class 4 runs in the UK. The crux rapid is called 'Pandora's box' or 'Surprise, Surprise'. The river above is normally negotiated by some form of eddy hopping. Shortly before the drop, the river splits around an island (main flow river right) then disappears around a corner, and most leaders would get out to inspect, probably getting the group to do the same. The lead in to the drop is at a similar standard to the rest of the river, but not exactly easy. The lead in comes into the left of the photo (from river right). Below the section shown in the photo, the channel turns left then right into slack water (large eddy river left, behind some boulders). The diagram attempts to show a bird's eye view of the rapid, take a minute to try to relate it to the photo (photo is taken form the rocks above the large eddy). The major hazard on the rapid is a rock, labelled on the diagram and visible just below the water to the right (river left) of the line. This has a worrying propensity to pin paddlers.
The first thing to think about is who should run the rapid. There may be group members who you are sure will show a magnetic attraction to the pinning rock. Tell them, as positively and constructively as possible that you think they'd be better off portaging. You may need to discuss the rapid in more depth with the other group members so that they can decide for themselves. Assuming some people want to run the drop, how should this be organised? Again, there is a line of sight problem, as may be seen in the photo. However, you can see better from the bank, and you're out of your boat anyway. Indeed, once standing up most of the rapid can be view from most locations. Where, then, is the position of maximum usefulness? Clearly, you'd like to be in a good position to get to any paddlers pinned on that nasty rock. Being at the bottom is less useful, as the group should be able to self rescue in the slack water below. The best place to be is probably somewhere between the island and the pinning rock, with a good view upstream. Sitting on the rocks to the right of the photo might be good. You'll need to either break out in the micro eddy, or break out higher up and walk down the island to get there. Send your best group member down first – if he has problems there may be little point in anyone else trying. You might decide that some assistance would be useful in a rescue, so get someone to join you near the pinning rock (don't rely on them breaking out into the micro eddy – walk down from higher up). The whole leadership process is simplified in lower water, when there is more space to move around above the pinning rock and the pinning hazard becomes worse and more obvious.
On to leadership signals.